How to properly say dog - who or what? - briefly
The term "dog" refers to a domesticated carnivorous mammal that is often kept as a pet. It is a noun that typically denotes the animal itself, rather than a person. When referring to a person, it is generally considered derogatory and should be avoided. The correct usage depends on whether you are referring to the animal or using it as an insult. In English, the term "dog" is always singular, regardless of the number of animals being referred to. The plural form is "dogs." It is important to use the term appropriately to avoid misunderstandings or offense.
How to properly say dog - who or what? - in detail
The proper way to refer to a dog—whether it is "who" or "what"—is a topic that often sparks debate among linguists, pet owners, and animal rights advocates. Understanding the nuances of this distinction is essential for clear and respectful communication.
Dogs, like all animals, are living beings with complex behaviors and emotions. However, in English, the choice between "who" and "what" is primarily determined by grammatical rules rather than philosophical considerations. Traditionally, "who" is used to refer to humans, while "what" is used for inanimate objects or non-human animals. Therefore, it is grammatically correct to say "What is that dog doing?" rather than "Who is that dog doing?"
However, the use of "who" for animals has gained traction in recent years, particularly among those who advocate for animal rights and recognize the cognitive and emotional capacities of animals. This shift is part of a broader movement to acknowledge the sentience and individuality of animals, moving away from the traditional view of animals as mere objects. In this perspective, referring to a dog as "who" can be seen as a way to acknowledge the dog's agency and personhood.
It is important to note that the choice between "who" and "what" can also depend on the specific situation and the relationship between the speaker and the dog. For example, in a formal or scientific setting, the use of "what" may be more appropriate to maintain objectivity. On the other hand, in a personal or informal setting, using "who" can reflect a deeper emotional connection and recognition of the dog's individuality.
In summary, while the grammatical rules of English dictate the use of "what" for dogs, the evolving understanding of animal cognition and emotions has led some to adopt the use of "who." This shift reflects a broader cultural and ethical consideration of animals as sentient beings deserving of respect and recognition. Ultimately, the choice between "who" and "what" depends on the speaker's intent, the setting, and the relationship with the dog.