Is it the Hound of Baskerville or Baskerville? - briefly
The correct title is "The Hound of the Baskervilles."
Is it the Hound of Baskerville or Baskerville? - in detail
The nomenclature surrounding Sir Arthur Conan Doyle's seminal work, "The Hound of the Baskervilles," has often been a subject of debate and confusion. The primary query revolves around whether the title should be "The Hound of the Baskervilles" or "The Hound of Baskerville." To delve into this intricacy, it is essential to examine the historical context and editorial choices that have shaped the title over time.
Firstly, Sir Arthur Conan Doyle initially titled his novel as "The Hound of the Baskervilles" when it was serialized in The Strand Magazine between August 1901 and April 1902. This title reflects the plural form, emphasizing the Baskerville family's lineage and heritage, which is a critical element in the story. The use of "the Baskervilles" underscores the generational curse that plagues the family, thus providing a more expansive narrative scope.
However, when the novel was first published as a book by George Newnes Ltd. in 1902, the title was altered to "The Hound of Baskerville." This singular form deviates from the original serialization but has been maintained in many subsequent editions and adaptations. The decision to change the title might have been influenced by editorial preferences or typographical considerations.
It is crucial to recognize that both titles convey different nuances, each adding a unique layer to the interpretation of the story. The plural form, "the Baskervilles," highlights the collective legacy and the dynastic aspect of the family, while the singular "Baskerville" places a stronger emphasis on Sir Henry Baskerville, the central character around whom the plot revolves.
In conclusion, both "The Hound of the Baskervilles" and "The Hound of Baskerville" are valid titles, each offering distinct perspectives on the narrative. While the original serialized version favors the plural form, the published book title opts for the singular. Understanding these variations enriches the reader's appreciation of the intricate details and editorial choices that have shaped one of the most enduring mysteries in literature.