Why did Gerasim drown the dog and didn't take it with him? - briefly
Gerasim chose to drown the dog rather than taking it with him out of compassion, to end its suffering quickly and painlessly. Additionally, he recognized that bringing the dog along would only prolong its misery in the harsh conditions they were about to face.
Why did Gerasim drown the dog and didn't take it with him? - in detail
The decision by Gerasim, as depicted in the story, to drown the dog rather than taking it with him is a poignant one that reflects several underlying themes and realities of his character and the world he inhabits.
Firstly, Gerasim's action can be seen as a merciful act, albeit tragic. The dog is old and sick, suffering from an incurable illness that causes it immense pain. By drowning the dog, Gerasim puts an end to its suffering, sparing it from further agony. This act underscores Gerasim's compassion and his understanding of the dog's plight. It is not a callous decision but one made out of empathy and concern for the animal's well-being.
Secondly, Gerasim's circumstances play a significant role in his choice. He is a servant, living in a world where his existence is largely defined by his service to others. Taking the dog with him would pose practical challenges and potential risks. As a servant, he likely has limited resources and no guaranteed stability or safety. Bringing an ailing dog along could jeopardize his own survival and make it more difficult for him to find work and support himself.
Moreover, Gerasim's decision may also reflect the societal norms and expectations of his time. In many historical contexts, servants were expected to prioritize their duties and the well-being of their masters above all else, including personal attachments or acts of compassion that could disrupt the established order. By drowning the dog, Gerasim adheres to these unwritten rules, demonstrating a sense of responsibility and obedience that was likely valued in his role as a servant.
Lastly, there is an element of pragmatism in Gerasim's choice. He understands the reality of his situation—he cannot provide the dog with the care it needs, and taking it with him would only prolong its suffering without offering a real solution. Instead, he chooses to end the dog's life mercifully, recognizing that this is the most humane course of action given his constraints.
In summary, Gerasim's decision to drown the dog rather than taking it with him is a complex one driven by compassion, practical considerations, societal expectations, and a deep understanding of the realities he faces. It highlights his character as someone who acts out of empathy and responsibility, even in the face of difficult choices.